From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Does GNAT support a thread-free RTS?
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:39:16 +0200
Date: 2011-09-13T11:39:16+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e6f24c4$0$7629$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2fwk04zet.fsf@pushface.org>
On 13.09.11 10:30, Simon Wright wrote:
> My prompt for asking this was a colleague who was used to Erlang and was
> complaining that GNAT's use of OS threads meant he would have to change
> his design mindset to not use thousands of tasks (Erlang processes).
Just an idea: using mostly functions together with protected
channel objects should allow to use Ada in a way one
might be used to when passing Erlang data around.
You write to some entry/procedure of a PO (pass data down
the channel) and read from some entry/function of the PO
(read from a channel). Add barriers as needed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-10 15:19 Does GNAT support a thread-free RTS? Simon Wright
2011-09-11 8:20 ` J-P. Rosen
2011-09-11 9:22 ` John B. Matthews
2011-09-11 9:49 ` anon
2011-09-11 10:29 ` Pascal Obry
2011-09-12 0:33 ` anon
2011-09-12 7:27 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-12 9:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-12 9:49 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-13 1:22 ` anon
2011-09-12 13:01 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-11 10:36 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-12 7:19 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-12 23:22 ` Rugxulo
2011-09-13 7:03 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-13 7:55 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-13 8:30 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-13 9:39 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2011-09-13 12:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-13 14:02 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-13 16:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-13 16:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-09-13 20:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-13 21:22 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-09-14 7:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-13 10:57 ` Peter C. Chapin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox