From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Constructor for a class with a task defined
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:37:36 +0200
Date: 2011-09-05T11:37:37+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e649861$0$7614$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wcc1uvxff9a.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
On 04.09.11 00:11, Robert A Duff wrote:
> I suggest you avoid anonymous access types. They are confusing.
> And the rules change in Ada 2012.
+1. I'll put a frame around this.
Is this issue worth a compiler switch? Maybe -gnat^ ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-05 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-01 0:31 Constructor for a class with a task defined Rego, P.
2011-09-01 1:40 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-09-01 4:54 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-09-01 10:13 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-03 15:18 ` Rego, P.
2011-09-03 22:11 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-05 9:37 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2011-09-08 10:22 ` Rego, P.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox