From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: ada commercial options
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:13:48 +0200
Date: 2011-04-21T23:13:48+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4db09e0c$0$7670$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB08C52.2090309@obry.net>
On 4/21/11 9:58 PM, Pascal Obry wrote:
> Le 21/04/2011 10:08, stefan-lucks@see-the.signature a �crit :
>> 2. Avoid gnat-specific libraries.
>
> That's not a problem. At some point AWS was compiled under GNAT and
> Aonix compiler. I had just copied some GNAT packages (GNAT.Regexp, and
> some others) from GNAT and compiled them with Aonix compiler.
Since these libraries aren't GNAT specific, then,
would it be o.K. to place them in a subsystem
whose name sounds a little less GNAT specific? :-)
Like PAL, or GNU, or ...
(Other GNAT.* packages really are GNAT specific in that
they use implementation defined attributes, for example,
and cannot be compiled with other Ada compilers.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 18:21 ada commercial options tonyg
2011-04-18 18:49 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2011-04-18 19:59 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-04-19 7:37 ` Maciej Sobczak
2011-04-20 23:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-21 6:18 ` Maciej Sobczak
2011-04-21 8:08 ` stefan-lucks
2011-04-21 9:37 ` Tero Koskinen
2011-04-21 19:58 ` Pascal Obry
2011-04-21 21:13 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2011-04-21 21:19 ` Pascal Obry
2011-04-21 19:58 ` Pascal Obry
2011-04-21 23:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-22 5:55 ` Simon Wright
2011-04-23 0:50 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-21 20:16 ` Nicholas Collin Paul Gloucester
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox