From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: When is a rename not a rename?
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:11:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2013-02-02T09:11:01-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4daac118-adf3-4db5-8115-dd5a5c9c9f28@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wccsj5ehjwm.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 8:26:01 AM UTC-6, Robert A Duff wrote:
>
> A similar example: Suppose we have:
>
> X : constant T := Some_Package.X;
>
> And suppose both X's are potentially use-visible at some
> place. You might want to be able to refer to X. (Currently,
> the X's hide each other, and I doubt that's going to change.)
Shouldn't the compiler complain of ambiguity and force a fully-qualified referral in that case? (Though you could 'promote' one's visibility to 'default' via renames in the current compilation-unit's context.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-02 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 1:24 When is a rename not a rename? Adam Beneschan
2013-01-30 0:28 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-01-30 0:52 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-01-30 9:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-01-30 14:35 ` ytomino
2013-02-01 10:44 ` Ada novice
2013-02-01 11:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-02-01 17:32 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-02-01 18:31 ` ytomino
2013-02-02 1:40 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-02-02 12:24 ` ytomino
2013-02-02 14:26 ` Robert A Duff
2013-02-02 17:11 ` Shark8 [this message]
2013-02-02 0:42 ` Brian Drummond
2013-02-02 11:43 ` AdaMagica
2013-02-03 11:50 ` Brian Drummond
2013-02-03 12:16 ` AdaMagica
2013-02-05 9:53 ` Ada novice
2013-02-01 17:48 ` Ada novice
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox