From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: -gnatN breakage was: Child vs nested package : efficiency matter
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:45:09 +0200
Date: 2010-06-02T18:45:09+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c068a95$0$6760$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11039f0d-ee37-4c99-ad4b-ab2ed658d553@m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
On 02.06.10 16:39, Vadim Godunko wrote:
> On Jun 2, 3:11 pm, "Alex R. Mosteo" <alejan...@mosteo.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> I've played with -gnatn and -gnatN in the past, and found that the latter
>> tends to bomb the compiler quite a lot. (GPL2008 and 2009 experiences).
>> Anyone seeing the same?
>
> -gnatN is obsolete, you must use pragma Inline/Inline_Always with -
> gnatn instead.
Does this mean that 3rd party source cannot be
inlined across units unless GNAT specific pragma Inline_Always
is added to these 3rd party sources?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-29 12:56 Child vs nested package : efficiency matter Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-05-30 1:17 ` BrianG
2010-06-01 15:03 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 15:34 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-01 15:38 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 19:04 ` Simon Wright
2010-06-01 19:11 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-02 11:11 ` -gnatN breakage was: " Alex R. Mosteo
2010-06-02 14:39 ` Vadim Godunko
2010-06-02 16:45 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2010-06-02 16:50 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-02 20:35 ` Vadim Godunko
2010-06-01 18:35 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 19:09 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-01 19:44 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 19:56 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-02 1:38 ` BrianG
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox