From: Peter Amey <peter.amey@praxis-cs.co.uk>
Subject: Re: procedural vs object oriented
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:38:58 +0100
Date: 2006-04-27T16:38:58+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bc6skF10g8f8U1@individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871wvjh9te.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
[snip]
>
>
> According to Robert Dewar during FOSDEM, nobody uses OOP in avionics
> software, because the uncertainty inherent to dynamic dispatching
> hinders certification. Is someone on this newsgroup in a position to
> give a counter-example?
>
The committee that is revising the DO-178B avionics "standard" is
currently meeting in Los Angeles. There is an entire sub-group devoted
to the problem of certifying O-O software. At the breaks, they look
like it is proving hard work!
Those of us in the formal methods sub-group are having a slightly easier
time.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-27 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-26 8:16 procedural vs object oriented Ananth the Boss
2006-04-26 9:17 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-04-26 17:44 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-04-26 12:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 1:33 ` bh
2006-04-27 5:22 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 7:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 10:42 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 11:07 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-04-27 12:03 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 17:19 ` Pascal Obry
2006-04-27 15:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-04-27 12:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 13:20 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 14:24 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-04-27 15:17 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 16:11 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-04-27 20:19 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 14:01 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-04-28 7:46 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-04-27 15:38 ` Peter Amey [this message]
2006-04-27 20:20 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-04-27 6:55 ` Ananth the Boss
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox