From: Bojan Bozovic <bozovic.bojan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: any gnoga wins? startups?
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 21:50:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2018-03-01T21:50:06-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bab728c-a011-4603-914a-fc96cc4d085a@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ad4875f-b38c-40d0-9271-2af84babf9dc@googlegroups.com>
On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 3:16:53 AM UTC+1, polymorph self wrote:
> news?
Well gnoga, for all what it tries to accomplish, is ahead of it's time. If you don't provide static page for web crawlers, your site might not be indexed at all, and even then, it might be penalized for serving different versions of site to visitors and search engine, but that's not due to flaw in gnoga itself, but due to the fact that web crawlers don't execute javascript nor use websockets. I suppose Ada AWS or even Ada CGI solution would be more web search engine friendly, and more appropriate for most web sites. Some might say that holds true for screen reader programs too, but in this age it's inexcusable to have web crawler or screen reader not able to process javascript, yet nobody objects.
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0ad4875f-b38c-40d0-9271-2af84babf9dc@googlegroups.com>
2018-03-02 5:50 ` Bojan Bozovic [this message]
2018-03-02 6:29 ` any gnoga wins? startups? gautier_niouzes
2018-03-02 6:35 ` Bojan Bozovic
2018-03-02 13:43 ` gautier_niouzes
2018-03-11 5:07 ` rabbibotton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox