From: ytomino <aghia05@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Two approaches of iterators for the key-value pairs
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:46:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2015-11-27T11:46:04-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b393c0a-e4cb-46b4-b55c-caf5c2d9a5ae@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834c6afa-870e-4921-a1f1-4fe2b061811a@googlegroups.com>
> > So the question really is, if we add Ada 2012 Iterator support to Ada.Directories and/or Ada.Environment_Variables, should the design be to
> > expose just an Iterator type, or both an Iterator Type, and an Iterable container type?
> >
> > My thought is that the latter might be better mostly because it would be more consistent with the other standard container types, but I could go either way.
Oh, I think the latter might be better for *Ada.Directories*, too, because its element (Directory_Entry_Type) is not the key-value pair.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-27 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-27 15:25 Two approaches of iterators for the key-value pairs ytomino
2015-11-27 16:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-27 18:08 ` ytomino
2015-11-27 20:50 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-27 22:52 ` bj.mooremr
2015-11-27 17:00 ` Pascal Obry
2015-11-27 18:25 ` ytomino
2015-11-27 17:43 ` Brad Moore
2015-11-27 19:38 ` ytomino
2015-11-27 19:46 ` ytomino [this message]
2015-11-27 23:11 ` Brad Moore
2015-11-28 8:58 ` Simon Wright
2015-11-28 19:54 ` Brad Moore
2015-11-28 23:34 ` Simon Wright
2015-11-29 21:17 ` Bob Duff
2015-11-29 16:17 ` Simon Wright
2015-11-29 17:55 ` ytomino
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox