From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Subject: Re: Rep Specing Variant Records
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:57:29 +0300
Date: 2009-09-17T09:57:29+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ab1ddf3$0$26339$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2009091621390916807-rblove@airmailnet>
Robert Love wrote:
> First, thanks to all who answered my question.
>
> My big concern about the presence of a discriminant in the derived type
> is that I'm shipping the record out via ether net to a C client to
> read. The C program will not tolerate the extra discriminate.
Have you looked at pragma Unchecked_Union (B.3.3)?
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 1:22 Rep Specing Variant Records R.B. Love
2009-09-16 8:19 ` Petter
2009-09-16 10:10 ` Martin
2009-09-16 15:03 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-09-17 2:39 ` Robert Love
2009-09-17 6:57 ` Niklas Holsti [this message]
2009-09-17 8:25 ` Martin
2009-09-18 2:28 ` Robert Love
2009-10-10 2:49 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox