From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: C++0x : no 'concepts'
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:12:21 +0200
Date: 2009-09-09T14:12:22+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4aa79ba6$0$32663$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0157a9fd-a1b2-473d-bc85-f84911720520@o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Martin schrieb:
> Crickey! How glad am Ada has strong typing and a generic contract
> model!!
>
> http://www.ddj.com/cpp/218600111
>
> And that was going to make life 'simpler'!?!?!?
Just saw this, addressing the question:
"The current definition of concepts and requirements for use drowns the
programmer in complexities of a magnitude not warranted by the need to
express type-checked 9constrained) generic programming."
From: Simplifying the use of concepts, linked in the article.
-
Fantasizing, could we have, in Ada,
- recursive instantiations of pure generics?
- an optional Compiler package?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 11:44 C++0x : no 'concepts' Martin
2009-09-09 12:12 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2009-09-09 12:15 ` Martin
2009-09-09 12:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-09-09 14:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-09-09 15:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-09-09 14:49 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-09-09 19:26 ` sjw
2009-09-10 0:16 ` wwilson
2009-09-10 0:45 ` Keith Thompson
2009-09-10 23:36 ` Stephen Leake
2009-09-11 4:36 ` wwilson
2009-09-11 10:10 ` John McCabe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox