From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Subject: Re: C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:58:00 +0300
Date: 2009-08-14T16:58:00+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a856d74$0$24772$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <owb0aenj5xv6.1qrhryqu7bp0i.dlg@40tude.net>
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> I wonder if transputers will make a come back. Arguably a multi-core memory
> sharing architecture is a dead end. Transputers had local memory. If they
> return as systems with 1000 and more loosely coupled nodes (cores), what
> will be a programming of look like? Ada's rendezvous will probably shine
> again...
The XMOS multi-core chips look like a born-again transputer system. See
www.xmos.com. The CTO is David May of Transputer fame. But no Ada
compiler so far, it seems.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-11 15:30 C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model? John McCabe
2009-08-11 20:51 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-08-12 12:25 ` John McCabe
2009-08-12 14:51 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-08-12 15:56 ` REH
2009-08-12 16:59 ` John McCabe
2009-08-12 17:21 ` REH
2009-08-12 20:41 ` Robert A Duff
2009-08-12 21:15 ` REH
2009-08-13 1:28 ` Randy Brukardt
2009-08-13 2:08 ` REH
2009-08-13 8:38 ` Pascal Obry
2009-08-13 8:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-13 11:32 ` Pascal Obry
2009-08-13 12:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-14 1:15 ` Brian Drummond
2009-08-14 11:24 ` Language checks (Was: C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model?) Jacob Sparre Andersen
2009-08-14 12:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-14 13:33 ` REH
2009-08-14 13:48 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 14:51 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 14:13 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-14 19:58 ` Language checks Robert A Duff
2009-08-15 0:10 ` Language checks (Was: C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model?) Randy Brukardt
2009-08-14 13:10 ` C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model? Gautier write-only
2009-08-14 13:16 ` REH
2009-08-12 21:24 ` REH
2009-08-13 13:51 ` John McCabe
2009-08-13 16:24 ` REH
2009-08-14 11:09 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 13:00 ` REH
2009-08-14 14:30 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 14:49 ` REH
2009-08-14 14:54 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 15:35 ` REH
2009-08-14 18:43 ` Robert A Duff
2009-08-14 18:54 ` REH
2009-08-14 22:33 ` Robert A Duff
2009-08-15 1:15 ` REH
2009-08-15 14:24 ` Robert A Duff
2009-08-14 15:09 ` Hyman Rosen
2009-08-14 15:12 ` REH
2009-08-13 13:55 ` John McCabe
2009-08-13 16:45 ` REH
2009-08-14 11:14 ` John McCabe
2009-08-12 20:53 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-08-11 23:53 ` jimmaureenrogers
2009-08-12 0:06 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-08-12 7:26 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-08-12 5:29 ` stefan-lucks
2009-08-12 15:00 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-08-12 9:27 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-08-12 15:14 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-08-13 12:47 ` Peter C. Chapin
2009-08-13 13:57 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 7:39 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-08-14 11:13 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 12:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-14 12:50 ` John McCabe
2009-08-14 13:50 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-14 13:58 ` Niklas Holsti [this message]
2009-08-14 14:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-14 22:25 ` Brian Drummond
2009-08-14 12:56 ` John McCabe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox