From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
Subject: Variant record question
Date: 2000/01/21
Date: 2000-01-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4V0i4.622$dw3.29725@news.wenet.net> (raw)
I've been working on some proof-of-concept code, and I don't understand
something about arrays of variant records. Specifically, the following code
works with a default discriminant defined for the type T_t, but if I remove
the default discriminant it fails at the declaration of T_array_t. Why must
I put in a default discriminant when I can then override it in an aggregate
(variable 'A' below)? Thanks for any clarification.
Mike
package Test is
type Dis_t is ( D1, D2 );
type T_t ( D : Dis_t := D1 ) is -- note default discriminant
record
case D is
when D1 =>
I : Integer;
when D2 =>
F : Float;
end case;
end record;
type T_array_t is array (Integer range <>) of T_t; -- fails if no default
Dis_t
A : T_array_t := ( (D => D1, I => 99), (D => D2, F => 99.99) );
end Test;
next reply other threads:[~2000-01-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-21 0:00 Mike Silva [this message]
2000-01-21 0:00 ` Variant record question Robert A Duff
2000-01-21 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
2000-01-21 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox