Re: ada commercial options

[Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>]

Le 21/04/2011 23:13, Georg Bauhaus a �crit :
> Since these libraries aren't GNAT specific, then,
> would it be o.K. to place them in a subsystem
> whose name sounds a little less GNAT specific? :-)
> 
> Like PAL, or GNU, or ...

GNAT had been chosen no need to change that. It means that it has been
implemented for GNAT and not part of the standard. That's why it is not
under Ada.

> (Other GNAT.* packages really are GNAT specific in that
> they use implementation defined attributes, for example,
> and cannot be compiled with other Ada compilers.)

Many GNAT.* packages are not GNAT specific, or if they are it is
probably easy to fix I think. AFAIR it was quite easy when I did that
for AWS.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|    http://www.obry.net  -  http://v2p.fr.eu.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B