Re: OT: Nuclear Waste (Was Re-Marketing Ada)

[dmytrylavrov@fsmail.net (Dmytry Lavrov)]

"Stephane Richard" <stephane.richard@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<I_aub.9262$3o6.6712@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>...
> "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@cogeco.ca> wrote
> >
> > Wishful thinking I think. ;-)
> > -- 
> > Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
> > http://home.cogeco.ca/~ve3wwg
> >
> 
> Really now? :-)
> 
> And in the 60s they were still saying that man would never walk on the moon
> ;-).  Looks like wishful thinking, targetted properly, can go places.  No?
> ;-)

Not,that's not about this.They truing to figure that our childs will
know what's to do with waste.  Not so  many peoples in 1960 really
needed "man on the moon" for something _useful_ .
    
As with antigravitation:for loong time peoples want it to solve some
problems,it's useful.Time-mashine:for far longer time peoples want
it,where that time mashine????Show me antigravity!!
Teleportation?,hehe.
Too wishful thinking about nuclear reactors using deiterium and
tritium.Quite unlikely(but possible) that in next 50 years we will
have  it.
If our childs will be able to use that waste in next 50 years,we
should have so simple thing as H-reactors NOW.


Why not think that our childs will prefer less/non dangerous solar
sources???????

http://www.electrosolar.co.uk/page1.htm
There's some progress in that area,and sometime if we will not do
something really stupid to stop progress,we will have it.That not a
too wishful prediction:we know whats to do,where to search for
solutions.

heh,about man on the moon:

http://www.ecotopia.com/apollo2/

- it's in progress and will be done.We don't need nuclear power.
Harmless energy sources grows faster.It's loosing way to spend money
on nucleart plants.

It's not a choise "nuclear power or burning coal".

It's choise
"not burning coal and use nuclear energy" vs "not burning coal and use
solar and wind and geo-thermal energy".

How you will "prove" that "nuclear plants is more harmless than solar
power"?