From: Lucretia <Lucretia9000@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: design changes per Ada 2005/12?
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2011-04-21T18:10:09-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b85caa-700c-44c8-8a11-2f512083aca5@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ioqd7m$vtt$1@speranza.aioe.org
On Apr 22, 12:05 am, tmo...@acm.org wrote:
> Randy,
> A lot of Claw used/tested new Ada 95 features. What would you *design*
> differently with Ada 2005 or 2012? (Not syntactic sugar).
>
> Similar question to other folks.
Interfaces if the FSF GNAT doesn't produce an ICE.
Luke.
P.S: The containers should've used interfaces!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-22 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 23:05 design changes per Ada 2005/12? tmoran
2011-04-22 1:10 ` Lucretia [this message]
2011-04-22 1:23 ` Shark8
2011-04-23 0:41 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-23 6:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-04-23 21:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2011-04-26 16:19 ` Lucretia
2011-04-26 23:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-23 0:36 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox