From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Subject: Re: C vs. ada for embeded system
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:18:11 +0100
Date: 2009-03-07T19:18:11+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b2ba63$0$17781$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gotp01$kbm$1@news.metronet.hr>
abcd a �crit :
> why ada is better of "C" language for embeded system?
Because Ada has been *designed* to meet criteria needed for embedded and
safety-critical systems. To my point of view it has not fails its goal.
See also SPARK if safety is just not an option.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://www.obry.net - http://v2p.fr.eu.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-07 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-07 12:23 C vs. ada for embeded system abcd
2009-03-07 13:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-03-07 18:12 ` Martin
2009-03-07 18:18 ` Pascal Obry [this message]
2009-03-07 18:29 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-03-07 19:54 ` Per Sandberg
2009-03-07 23:26 ` anon
2009-03-08 10:43 ` Pascal Obry
2009-03-09 16:02 ` mccormick
2009-03-10 17:33 ` Martin Krischik
2009-03-11 10:14 ` christoph.grein
2009-03-11 14:07 ` John McCormick
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox