From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: Optional body for nested generic
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2011-09-22T17:03:59-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <487f7158-2f6f-4fb8-8c3e-7ca58f0d1794@r26g2000prb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: j5gerj$4nt$1@munin.nbi.dk
On Sep 22, 4:03 pm, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> The test was disputed (not by us, I don't think), and the ARG at the time
> confirmed it (I'm pretty sure there is an Ada 83 AI to this effect, but I'm
> too lazy to look it up right now).
It's probably AI83-400. There's also AI83-856, but there's no
discussion in that AI and it might be essentially a duplicate.
-- Adam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-23 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 12:48 Optional body for nested generic Simon Wright
2011-09-20 15:00 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-09-20 15:18 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-20 15:15 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-21 15:01 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-09-22 3:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-09-22 14:28 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-22 23:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-09-23 0:03 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox