From: Sébastien <seb.morand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Access keyword
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:32:40 +0000
Date: 2008-04-30T14:32:40+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48188308.3030407@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fv8495$du0$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
> You often need access *types* to implement the bodies of decent
> abstractions, but it is rare that they need to be exposed in the interface
> in any way.
I got the point, it's exaclty what happen in some example of chain
linked implementation, I understood this usage and why they shouldn't be
used in the way of C/C++ (the world where I come from actually).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 13:55 Access keyword Sébastien
2008-04-29 14:35 ` Peter Hermann
2008-04-29 14:43 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-04-29 15:16 ` stefan-lucks
2008-04-29 16:31 ` Sébastien
2008-04-29 19:55 ` Gautier
2008-04-30 14:26 ` Sébastien
2008-04-30 17:13 ` Gautier
2008-04-30 20:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-04-29 17:37 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-29 19:08 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-04-29 21:03 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-29 21:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-04-30 4:36 ` Gautier
2008-04-30 7:15 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-30 7:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-04-30 9:21 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-04-30 15:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-30 15:20 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-30 21:32 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-30 21:58 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-05-01 1:10 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-30 23:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-04-30 14:32 ` Sébastien [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox