From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh-plus.nicif-bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: default formal parameters in generic declarations
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:15:45 +0100
Date: 2008-03-03T12:15:45+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47cbdde1$0$11000$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1qlkyebn1yxut$.1r1eauouyt3l8$.dlg@40tude.net>
Dmitry A. Kazakov schrieb:
> IMO, it is better (as always) to get rid of generics. Default values of
> packages are in fact inheritable interfaces. Thus inheritance should be the
> way. I would extend this part of the language rather than generics.
>
Supposedly, removal of generics will also remove the
tags from concrete types?
How do you deal with what is now usually a generic
swap procedure?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 17:21 default formal parameters in generic declarations Eric Hughes
2008-03-02 17:42 ` Robert A Duff
2008-03-02 19:40 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-03 9:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-03-03 11:15 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2008-03-03 13:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-03-04 16:15 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-04 3:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-03-04 16:51 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-04 18:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-03-05 21:08 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-06 9:32 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-03-06 18:05 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-06 22:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-03-07 10:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-03-07 20:09 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-03 12:42 ` Stephen Leake
2008-03-04 13:50 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2008-03-04 16:56 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-04 16:44 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-05 13:11 ` Stephen Leake
2008-03-05 21:41 ` Eric Hughes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox