From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus.rm.tsoh@maps.futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:10:30 +0200
Date: 2007-05-31T23:07:48+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465f3924$0$6411$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2ira8lpt5.fsf@mac.com>
Simon Wright wrote:
> given that GNAT already has a
> library. It would have been yet another library to justify to the
> technical authority.
Are standards and portability still an issue in Ada projects?
Aonix seems to offer a standards conforming POSIX binding.
Can't say how much networking it offers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-31 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 14:58 System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings Maciej Sobczak
2007-05-31 15:06 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-05-31 15:23 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-05-31 16:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-05-31 19:08 ` Michael Bode
2007-05-31 19:48 ` Markus E Leypold
2007-05-31 20:07 ` Simon Wright
2007-05-31 21:10 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2007-06-01 19:50 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 6:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-01 19:29 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 6:59 ` anon
2007-06-01 10:17 ` Markus E Leypold
2007-06-01 13:01 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-01 20:13 ` Pascal Obry
2007-06-01 20:35 ` Pascal Obry
2007-06-01 17:42 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-06-01 19:32 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 20:45 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-02 5:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox