From: Martin <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: 'Image for composite types
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-05-28T03:42:14-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45bdddd8-01bc-4273-a182-87b9664a812b@r34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4a1e5f19$0$32678$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net
On May 28, 10:53 am, Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauh...@futureapps.de>
wrote:
[snip]
> This assumes that a stupid implementation defined subprogram
> is enough for testing / debugging.
I'm greedy...I want to override any stupid implementation defined
subprogram with my fancy one! (perhaps one for XML output, another for
csv, etc depending on the what I need the output for).
Cheers
-- Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-27 22:20 'Image for composite types Martin
2009-05-27 23:23 ` Robert A Duff
2009-05-27 23:44 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-05-28 6:46 ` Martin
2009-05-28 9:53 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-05-28 10:42 ` Martin [this message]
2009-05-28 11:31 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-05-28 16:25 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-05-28 16:47 ` Martin
2009-05-28 3:36 ` Per Sandberg
2009-05-28 5:15 ` tmoran
2009-06-06 9:17 ` Martin
2009-05-28 9:13 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-05-31 12:17 ` Stephen Leake
2009-06-06 9:17 ` Martin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox