From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@nospam.please>
Subject: A physical comparison of Ada 95 and Ada 2005
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:29:15 +0200
Date: 2007-01-21T15:29:15+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45b3695f$0$22525$39db0f71@news.song.fi> (raw)
A few days ago I received an eagerly awaited Springer hard-copy of the
Ada 2005 LRM (courtesy of Ada Europe, to whom many thanks). Being less
busy than usual I have had some time to study this work and compare it
to the earlier Springer LRM for Ada 95, with the following results:
Ada 95 Ada 2005
Weight (g) : 985 1205
Thickness (mm): 32 27
The height and width are the same, so the overhead in terms of desk-top
area is unchanged, which is good. The result of this comparison is thus
that Ada 2005 is 44.9% denser than Ada 95, as represented by their
respective LRMs. The analogous comparison based on the text of the LRMs
was not in scope for this study :-)
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-21 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-21 13:29 Niklas Holsti [this message]
2007-01-21 20:07 ` A physical comparison of Ada 95 and Ada 2005 prichtmyer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox