From: Emmanuel Briot <briot@nospam.invalid.fr>
Subject: Re: Profiler?
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:29:35 +0100
Date: 2006-11-23T10:29:35+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <456569f7$0$428$4d4eb98e@read.news.fr.uu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8sfe34-f3p.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com
>>>If I try to make an assumption (and I could get this wrong) and assume
>>>by Ada you mean GNAT and then assume that perhaps you mean Linux I can
>>>say that gprof is actually an "ok" profiler. It is not great but it gets
>>>the job done.
>>
>>
>> Based in that same assumption, I've used successfully valgrind and
>> kcachegrind with nice results, also for multitasking programs. Oprofile
>> was in my list of things to look at that I never reached.
One additional one which I find even more convenient is sysprof on linux,
since it will monitor the whole system, you can start it whenever you want
(ie you don't have to profile since the startup of your application), and
has a nice GUI to examine the results
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-23 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-22 14:52 Profiler? Harald Korneliussen
2006-11-22 15:42 ` Profiler? Jeffrey Creem
2006-11-22 16:34 ` Profiler? Alex R. Mosteo
2006-11-22 18:01 ` Profiler? Jeffrey Creem
2006-11-23 9:29 ` Emmanuel Briot [this message]
2006-11-23 9:57 ` Profiler? Alex R. Mosteo
2006-11-24 7:45 ` Profiler? Harald Korneliussen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox