From: draves@harvard.ARPA (Richard Draves)
Subject: validation stringency
Date: Sun, 10-Mar-85 03:03:59 EST [thread overview]
Date: Sun Mar 10 03:03:59 1985
Message-ID: <453@harvard.ARPA> (raw)
I recently came across a limitation on how complicated a type
declaration pcc will accept. I don't remember any similar
nesting restrictions in the Ada standard. Are Ada implementations
required to allow unlimited nesting? Does the validation suite
make some sort of attempt to check this?
Rich
--
"a picture in the head is a gory murder in an art gallery"
-- Stephen Kosslyn
next reply other threads:[~1985-03-10 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1985-03-10 8:03 Richard Draves [this message]
1985-03-12 18:01 ` validation stringency Norman Diamond
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox