From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison)
Subject: Re: Alternatives to Emacs under Linux?
Date: 13 Nov 2002 06:32:05 -0800
Date: 2002-11-13T14:32:05+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4519e058.0211130632.6c5c2311@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnat2kac.mq.randhol+news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
Preben Randhol <randhol+news@pvv.org> wrote in message news:<slrnat2kac.mq.randhol+news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>...
> Huh? Emacs may be many things, but buggy? Not even a Vim user like me
I have never done it with Linux, but I've found it quite buggy
whenever I compile it from sources myself. :-( Prebuilt binaries tend
to be solid though; certianly they are way more stable than
VisualStudio.
> Of course Vim is the best :-) http://vim.sf.net
Yeah. You can't get a MS "Clippy" clone for Emacs, like you can for
Vim :-) http://vigor.sourceforge.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-13 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-12 17:20 Alternatives to Emacs under Linux? Victor Porton
2002-11-12 18:25 ` chris.danx
2002-11-12 19:07 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-13 14:32 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2002-11-13 15:43 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-12 22:21 ` Francisco Santoyo
2002-11-13 7:59 ` Kees Serier
2002-11-13 10:59 ` Eric Jacoboni
2002-11-14 12:05 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-11 16:56 ` Nicolas Seriot
2003-01-12 15:00 ` Stefan Scholl
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox