* High Dependability Computing Consortium @ 2002-05-16 6:14 Russ 2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers 2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Russ @ 2002-05-16 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw) I am curious to know what Ada folks think of the High Dependability Computing Consortium http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html Are they on the right track, and are they giving adequate attention to Ada? Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: High Dependability Computing Consortium 2002-05-16 6:14 High Dependability Computing Consortium Russ @ 2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers 2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jim Rogers @ 2002-05-17 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw) Russ wrote: > I am curious to know what Ada folks think of the High Dependability > Computing Consortium > > http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html > > Are they on the right track, and are they giving adequate attention to > Ada? Thanks. > Interesting work. As usual in such meetings, they are spending a significant amount of time re-inventing the wheel. They also do not seem to be listening to each other very well. Each document displayed a tight focus by its author(s) with no evidence of interaction. Boehm, as usual, displayed a lot of graphical data with little connection to details. Other groups seem to want to jump into the details with little formal analysis. This meeting appears to be a very early step in defining various positions and beliefs. This primarily political process will continue until some subgroup becomes dominant. At that point a serious technical proposal may emerge. Jim Rogers ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: High Dependability Computing Consortium 2002-05-16 6:14 High Dependability Computing Consortium Russ 2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers @ 2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2002-05-17 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) wrote in message news:<bebbba07.0205152214.fc253e7@posting.google.com>... > I am curious to know what Ada folks think of the High Dependability > Computing Consortium > > http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html > > Are they on the right track, and are they giving adequate attention to > Ada? Thanks. I'd be more interested in what it has to do with the "Sustainable Computing Consortium" (http://www.sustainablecomputing.org/) . They seem to have overlapping charters, and both seem to be run for the benifit of Carnigie Mellon. -- T.E.D. Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison) Homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-17 17:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-05-16 6:14 High Dependability Computing Consortium Russ 2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers 2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox