From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison)
Subject: Re: child packages and nested packages
Date: 29 Mar 2002 07:14:11 -0800
Date: 2002-03-29T15:14:12+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4519e058.0203290714.5a3054e@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a81kui$16q8$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz
"Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<a81kui$16q8$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>...
> > In the CORBA context, this would mean intertwining hand written code
> > with automatically generated code:
> > A.B is automatically generated while A.B.Impl is hand written.
>
> Er, sorry, I've just clicked the wrong button and sent this to Oliver by
> e-mail:
>
> Just a quick idea - maybe using "is separate" in some right places would
> solve it? Like having the spec of A.B.Impl inside A.B, and having the body
> separate.
I don't know enough about nested packages and separates to say if/how
this would work. But issues like this are the reason "is separate" is
in the language.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-29 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-23 15:02 child packages and nested packages Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-25 15:01 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-25 19:26 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-25 22:31 ` Stephen Leake
2002-04-23 21:44 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-04-24 14:52 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-26 14:21 ` Marin David Condic
2002-03-28 9:51 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-28 14:49 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-28 18:30 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-28 22:13 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-29 5:30 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-29 11:59 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-03-29 15:14 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2002-03-29 13:05 ` Oliver Kellogg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-04 5:37 Oliver Kellogg
2010-03-04 14:55 ` Admin - Do Not Email
2010-03-04 16:12 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox