From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison)
Subject: Re: child packages and nested packages
Date: 28 Mar 2002 14:13:15 -0800
Date: 2002-03-28T22:13:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4519e058.0203281413.7b27ff92@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6a6390b8.0203281030.23c8356c@posting.google.com
okellogg@freenet.de (Oliver Kellogg) wrote in message news:<6a6390b8.0203281030.23c8356c@posting.google.com>...
> dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) wrote in message news:<4519e058.0203280649.2b6d7788@posting.google.com>...
> >
> > Why can't "type_in_a" be put inside the same "A" package as "B"? That
> > would compile, and would seem to be the natural mapping of this.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand. What exactly do you mean?
>
> As soon as interface B is mapped as a child package A.B,
> there is no way A can "with" its own child A.B ?
No. I didn't say to make B a child package of A. Instead I am talking
about nesting B's child inside of A along with B.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-28 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-23 15:02 child packages and nested packages Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-25 15:01 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-25 19:26 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-25 22:31 ` Stephen Leake
2002-04-23 21:44 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-04-24 14:52 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-26 14:21 ` Marin David Condic
2002-03-28 9:51 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-28 14:49 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-28 18:30 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-28 22:13 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2002-03-29 5:30 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-29 11:59 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-03-29 15:14 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-29 13:05 ` Oliver Kellogg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-04 5:37 Oliver Kellogg
2010-03-04 14:55 ` Admin - Do Not Email
2010-03-04 16:12 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox