From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison)
Subject: Re: Complexity of protected objects
Date: 25 Feb 2002 14:01:14 -0800
Date: 2002-02-25T22:01:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4519e058.0202251401.27b95bb0@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a5dont$dh9$1@helle.btinternet.com
"tony gair" <tonygair@nespamtome.btinternet.com> wrote in message news:<a5dont$dh9$1@helle.btinternet.com>...
> J Barnes recommends that protected objects be as small as possible, so
> being a little
> bloody minded I want to see what the limits are for protected objects ,
I've generally found that to be good advice. In particular, my PO's
always seem to end up just being specialized semaphores or locks, no
matter how grandiose I start out planning to make them. Things just
work a lot better that way.
--
T.E.D.
Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison)
Homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 16:28 Complexity of protected objects tony gair
2002-02-25 16:45 ` Marin David Condic
2002-03-03 1:11 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 4:13 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-03-03 19:50 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-25 17:35 ` Jim Rogers
2002-02-28 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2002-02-28 23:32 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-03-01 5:45 ` Jim Rogers
2002-03-03 0:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-01 17:42 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 1:06 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 6:53 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 19:36 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 20:04 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 0:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 0:32 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-25 22:01 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2002-03-03 1:08 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-03-04 16:44 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox