From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison)
Subject: Re: alerting Ada advocates
Date: 18 Jan 2002 11:31:04 -0800
Date: 2002-01-18T19:31:05+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4519e058.0201181131.4bbfb697@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a29ad4$q5k$1@news.btv.ibm.com
pontius@btv.MBI.com.invalid (Dale Pontius) wrote in message news:<a29ad4$q5k$1@news.btv.ibm.com>...
> And I happened to throw in a reply tying VHDL vs Verilog back to Pascal
> vs C, coupled it to Ada, and wondered why when we're becoming more and
> more security conscious, we're still coding in C, leaving prevention of
> buffer overflows and the like to due diligence alone.
Actually, it had 3 points when I looked at it (now 4 and
"Informative", since I haven't found anything better to put points on
today).
> No mods, and the only reply I got was that I should ditch VHDL and use
> the Verilog equivalent of lint.
I almost never get mods or replies to slashdot posts I make, and your
karma looks way better than mine.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-18 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-17 12:34 alerting Ada advocates Peter Hermann
2002-01-17 19:52 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-18 14:10 ` Dale Pontius
2002-01-18 19:31 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox