comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Tactical Data Systems
@ 1989-03-06  2:03 Scott Neugroschl
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Scott Neugroschl @ 1989-03-06  2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)



From: abcscnge@csuna (Scott Neugroschl)


[Mod.note: Note that this is crossposted between sci.military [moderated]
and comp.lang.ada.   I'd like everyone to reply to Scott by email, rather
than following-up, unless you'r certain your information is vital to
both groups.  I trust Scott will then post a summary of the information
he receives. - Bill ]


I read in one of the trade rags (I forget which, but a copy is posted on
the printer room door at work -- not here :-)) that AFATDS (Advanced Field
Artillery Tactical Data System) completed its FQT with only 31 TR's, all
priority 3 or lower.  For those who don't know about TR priority, 1 prevents
fielding, 2 prevents fielding unless a good explanation can be given, 3 is
"affects mission, workaround exists", 4 & 5 are less critical still.

Given that AFATDS is (from what I hear) around 1 _Million_ lines of Ada code,
and knowing what I know about how the Army tests software, I find this hard
to believe.  Can anyone give me the straight dope (comp.lang.ada'ers reply
by E-mail, I don't subscribe to your group)?  Also, does anyone know if
Congress has unfrozen/refunded the AFATDS program?


-- 
Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl
UUCP:  ...!sm.unisys.com!csun!csuna.csun.edu!abcscnge
-- "Beat me, whip me, make me code in Ada"
-- Disclaimers?  We don't need no stinking disclaimers!!!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~1989-03-06  2:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1989-03-06  2:03 Tactical Data Systems Scott Neugroschl

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox