From: abcscnge@csuna (Scott Neugroschl)
Subject: Tactical Data Systems
Date: 6 Mar 89 02:03:33 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4510@cbnews.ATT.COM> (raw)
From: abcscnge@csuna (Scott Neugroschl)
[Mod.note: Note that this is crossposted between sci.military [moderated]
and comp.lang.ada. I'd like everyone to reply to Scott by email, rather
than following-up, unless you'r certain your information is vital to
both groups. I trust Scott will then post a summary of the information
he receives. - Bill ]
I read in one of the trade rags (I forget which, but a copy is posted on
the printer room door at work -- not here :-)) that AFATDS (Advanced Field
Artillery Tactical Data System) completed its FQT with only 31 TR's, all
priority 3 or lower. For those who don't know about TR priority, 1 prevents
fielding, 2 prevents fielding unless a good explanation can be given, 3 is
"affects mission, workaround exists", 4 & 5 are less critical still.
Given that AFATDS is (from what I hear) around 1 _Million_ lines of Ada code,
and knowing what I know about how the Army tests software, I find this hard
to believe. Can anyone give me the straight dope (comp.lang.ada'ers reply
by E-mail, I don't subscribe to your group)? Also, does anyone know if
Congress has unfrozen/refunded the AFATDS program?
--
Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl
UUCP: ...!sm.unisys.com!csun!csuna.csun.edu!abcscnge
-- "Beat me, whip me, make me code in Ada"
-- Disclaimers? We don't need no stinking disclaimers!!!
reply other threads:[~1989-03-06 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox