From: "Peter C. Chapin" <pchapin@sover.net>
Subject: Re: Subtype conformance... not what I was expecting.
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:00:47 -0400
Date: 2006-07-26T20:00:47-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44c80229$0$2922$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jsukvmhjoxjb.9kh8vz1wk66i.dlg@40tude.net>
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> (1) We have to distinguish <in:, <out:, <inout:, and, well, <access:.
Yes I can see that 'out' or 'inout' parameters complicate things. This
alone convinces me that trying to do what I was suggesting is probably
not worth the trouble.
Thanks for your replies. I will reflect on them.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-26 3:02 Subtype conformance... not what I was expecting Peter C. Chapin
2006-07-26 6:58 ` Craig Carey
2006-07-26 7:54 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-26 14:32 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-07-26 15:38 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-27 0:02 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-07-26 18:40 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-27 0:00 ` Peter C. Chapin [this message]
2006-07-26 8:06 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-26 14:15 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-07-26 21:23 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox