From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: How to properly clean up an extended, generic structure?
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 16:57:52 +0200
Date: 2006-07-09T16:56:32+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44b11920$0$26271$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44b107b7$0$3629$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
Peter C. Chapin wrote:
> It occurs to
> me, though, that Item_Type might have its own clean up needs. I assume
> that Unchecked_Deallocation knows nothing about that.
According to LRM 7.6.1(10), an instance of Unchecked_Deallocation
will trigger finalization of the object before its storage is reclaimed.
Perhaps you could consider the interactions of nested scopes with
finalization of objects declared in these scopes?
-- Georg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-09 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-09 13:42 How to properly clean up an extended, generic structure? Peter C. Chapin
2006-07-09 14:29 ` jimmaureenrogers
2006-07-09 14:33 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-07-09 16:21 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-07-09 14:49 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-09 14:57 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2006-07-09 19:46 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-07-10 7:38 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox