From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Q: null records and box
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:50:31 +0200
Date: 2006-06-17T17:49:38+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44942492$0$11080$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
John Barnes writes about a null record type, "The aggregate
for the (null) value ... can be written as (null record)
or even as (others => <>)." (Barnes 2006, p.146)
Is the latter part is now rubbed out by LRM 4.3.1(15),
so that (null record) is the one way to express a null
record aggregate?
(GNAT would be right, then.)
Georg
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-17 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-17 15:50 Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2006-06-19 23:44 ` null records and box Randy Brukardt
2006-06-20 14:44 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-20 20:32 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-20 21:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox