* GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? @ 2006-03-21 14:11 Adrian Hoe 2006-03-21 15:19 ` Alex R. Mosteo ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-21 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi, I have been using SuSE Linux all the time and I am tired of SuSE's broken online updates which frequently crashed and hang my systems. This happened again 2 days ago after I performed online update to some systems both in my office and home. I have been testing Debian on two of my machines at work and both run very stable without reboot. The online update using apt-get was very stable indeed. One advantage of Debian is that one can easily perform a version update using apt-get. A version update on SuSE is a little tricky and troublesome. I am thinking of switching to Debian or Gentoo. Does anyone have any experience developing Ada applications on both Debian and Gentoo Linux? I read some unfavored comments on Gentoo regarding outdated emerge on gnat and Ada related packages. On the other hand, I have heard many good comments about developing Ada applications on both Debian and Gentoo. I have also read and heard about developing Ada applications on SuSE. I am a little confused and eagerly to move away from SuSE or I should stay with SuSE. Can someone shine some light of wisdom on me? Thanks and best regards, -- Adrian Hoe http://adrianhoe.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-21 14:11 GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-21 15:19 ` Alex R. Mosteo 2006-03-21 23:42 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-22 2:40 ` Jeffrey Creem 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Alex R. Mosteo @ 2006-03-21 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw) Adrian Hoe wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using SuSE Linux all the time and I am tired of SuSE's > broken online updates which frequently crashed and hang my systems. > This happened again 2 days ago after I performed online update to some > systems both in my office and home. I have been testing Debian on two > of my machines at work and both run very stable without reboot. The > online update using apt-get was very stable indeed. > > One advantage of Debian is that one can easily perform a version update > using apt-get. A version update on SuSE is a little tricky and > troublesome. > > I am thinking of switching to Debian or Gentoo. Does anyone have any > experience developing Ada applications on both Debian and Gentoo Linux? > > I read some unfavored comments on Gentoo regarding outdated emerge on > gnat and Ada related packages. On the other hand, I have heard many > good comments about developing Ada applications on both Debian and > Gentoo. I have also read and heard about developing Ada applications on > SuSE. > > I am a little confused and eagerly to move away from SuSE or I should > stay with SuSE. > > Can someone shine some light of wisdom on me? I'm sure other people will have things to add, but in debian you have a commited maintainer (I think it's Ludovic Brenta) which actively keeps the Ada packages tuned. If I were in your situation I'd go for debian because of this. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-21 14:11 GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? Adrian Hoe 2006-03-21 15:19 ` Alex R. Mosteo @ 2006-03-21 23:42 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-22 3:08 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-22 2:40 ` Jeffrey Creem 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bobby D. Bryant @ 2006-03-21 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw) On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using SuSE Linux all the time and I am tired of SuSE's > broken online updates which frequently crashed and hang my systems. > This happened again 2 days ago after I performed online update to some > systems both in my office and home. I have been testing Debian on two > of my machines at work and both run very stable without reboot. The > online update using apt-get was very stable indeed. > > One advantage of Debian is that one can easily perform a version update > using apt-get. A version update on SuSE is a little tricky and > troublesome. > > I am thinking of switching to Debian or Gentoo. Does anyone have any > experience developing Ada applications on both Debian and Gentoo Linux? > > I read some unfavored comments on Gentoo regarding outdated emerge on > gnat and Ada related packages. On the other hand, I have heard many > good comments about developing Ada applications on both Debian and > Gentoo. I have also read and heard about developing Ada applications on > SuSE. > > I am a little confused and eagerly to move away from SuSE or I should > stay with SuSE. > > Can someone shine some light of wisdom on me? I use GNAT on Gentoo. I set flags to let me use the most recent stuff available (kind of like using Debian Unstable), and I get the GNAT 3.4.5 that's built on GCC 3.4.5. -- Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-21 23:42 ` Bobby D. Bryant @ 2006-03-22 3:08 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-23 14:00 ` Bobby D. Bryant 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-22 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw) How about gcc/gnat 4.x? Linux distros are quite slow in this. Most of 4.x is in unstable production. Blastwave.org(Solaris) and macada.org (Apple Mac OS X) have rolled out 4.x. Sometimes I find that it is difficult to keep abreast. One of my recent concern is that I got a compiler error from gnat 3.3.3 and 3.4.x on SuSE. There is no problem at all on 4.0.2 on Solaris. I can't find 3.4.5 update for SuSE 9.1 and I think SuSE is not going to maintain any updates for 9.1. There is no aparent reason for them to do ssince they have rolled out 10 and soon 10.1 and 10.2. The ony option is to upgrade to SuSE 9.3 or 10. The upgrade is almost like a full installation. My upgrade from SuSE 8.2 to 9.1 was a painful one. It's a nightmare to uprade 4 machines (mine, does not includes others) at work and 3 at home! -- Adrian Hoe http://adrianhoe.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-22 3:08 ` Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-23 14:00 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-23 14:46 ` Alex R. Mosteo 2006-03-23 19:46 ` Martin Krischik 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bobby D. Bryant @ 2006-03-23 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw) On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> wrote: > How about gcc/gnat 4.x? Should be a simple matter of hacking an ebuild. Is there any reason I would want to do that? What's new between 3.4.x and 4.x? -- Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-23 14:00 ` Bobby D. Bryant @ 2006-03-23 14:46 ` Alex R. Mosteo 2006-03-24 5:22 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-23 19:46 ` Martin Krischik 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Alex R. Mosteo @ 2006-03-23 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw) Bobby D. Bryant wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>How about gcc/gnat 4.x? > > > Should be a simple matter of hacking an ebuild. > > Is there any reason I would want to do that? What's new between 3.4.x > and 4.x? Most evident changes would be in Ada05 support, which is being added. I'm aware of several bugfixes in that regard and I've already seen a new error message (for something that previously went undetected). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-23 14:46 ` Alex R. Mosteo @ 2006-03-24 5:22 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-24 15:02 ` Alex R. Mosteo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bobby D. Bryant @ 2006-03-24 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw) On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com> wrote: > Bobby D. Bryant wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> How about gcc/gnat 4.x? >> >> Should be a simple matter of hacking an ebuild. >> >> Is there any reason I would want to do that? What's new between 3.4.x >> and 4.x? > > Most evident changes would be in Ada05 support Thanks. I guess it's about time to take that plunge... -- Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-24 5:22 ` Bobby D. Bryant @ 2006-03-24 15:02 ` Alex R. Mosteo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Alex R. Mosteo @ 2006-03-24 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Bobby D. Bryant wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com> wrote: > > >>Bobby D. Bryant wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>How about gcc/gnat 4.x? >>> >>>Should be a simple matter of hacking an ebuild. >>> >>>Is there any reason I would want to do that? What's new between 3.4.x >>>and 4.x? >> >>Most evident changes would be in Ada05 support > > Thanks. I guess it's about time to take that plunge... Be warned that the thing is somewhat buggy, at least in the latest GAP/GPL release. That said, once you get the grasp of what works and what not, you can start to use some useful 2005 features. I guess that gcc 4.1 can be a goop step forward in that respect, since some things that are improved over GAP/GPL (this is hearsay) are "limited with", anonymous access type record members, proper initialization of default box notation with controlled types, dot notation; all of them features that I find pretty useful. But then, I have GAP support so I want to continue using that release, even if it's less functional. If you're interested in some particular 2005 feature you can ask me and I can tell you my experience (if I've tried it, of course) with the GAP/GPL releases. (I believe they're equivalent, except for the support). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-23 14:00 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-23 14:46 ` Alex R. Mosteo @ 2006-03-23 19:46 ` Martin Krischik 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Martin Krischik @ 2006-03-23 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw) Bobby D. Bryant wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> wrote: > >> How about gcc/gnat 4.x? > > Should be a simple matter of hacking an ebuild. > > Is there any reason I would want to do that? What's new between 3.4.x > and 4.x? Ada 2005. Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-21 14:11 GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? Adrian Hoe 2006-03-21 15:19 ` Alex R. Mosteo 2006-03-21 23:42 ` Bobby D. Bryant @ 2006-03-22 2:40 ` Jeffrey Creem 2006-03-22 4:12 ` Adrian Hoe 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey Creem @ 2006-03-22 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw) Adrian Hoe wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using SuSE Linux all the time and I am tired of SuSE's > broken online updates which frequently crashed and hang my systems. > This happened again 2 days ago after I performed online update to some > systems both in my office and home. I have been testing Debian on two > of my machines at work and both run very stable without reboot. The > online update using apt-get was very stable indeed. > > One advantage of Debian is that one can easily perform a version update > using apt-get. A version update on SuSE is a little tricky and > troublesome. > > I am thinking of switching to Debian or Gentoo. Does anyone have any > experience developing Ada applications on both Debian and Gentoo Linux? > > I read some unfavored comments on Gentoo regarding outdated emerge on > gnat and Ada related packages. On the other hand, I have heard many > good comments about developing Ada applications on both Debian and > Gentoo. I have also read and heard about developing Ada applications on > SuSE. > > I am a little confused and eagerly to move away from SuSE or I should > stay with SuSE. > > Can someone shine some light of wisdom on me? > > Thanks and best regards, > -- > Adrian Hoe > http://adrianhoe.net > Since a lot of the commercial companies (at least in the US) that claim to support Linux target Red hat as the primary (or only) Linux, we tend to use it at work when we use Linux. So, for home use, I decided to go with Centos (www.centos.org) which attempts to be very close to red hat releases with the changes being generally limited to staying in compliance with the Red hat Trademark guidelines. I have successfully upgraded OS versions with yum under Centos. Note that even for normal updates, I have been mildly burned by yum updates. The biggest problem has been things like php library changes that I update and then don't reboot. When I finally reboot for other reasons 3 months later and my website stops working, it has taken as long 10-15 minutes to figure out what I broke. Centos is not the "best" Linux around and I would not claim anything like the level of support for Ada that Debian currently has but it probably deserves a spot in the trade space. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-22 2:40 ` Jeffrey Creem @ 2006-03-22 4:12 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-22 9:06 ` Pascal Obry 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-22 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw) What I want is easy updates of software packages and kernel without going through hassle installation/upgrade. Centos is lovely but it is SuSE-like, a "CD"-based rather than source (Gentoo) and binary (Debian) -based. Both Gentoo and Debian allow to download specific software packages to update. Another lovely distro is Ubuntu. Like Centos, it is very nice to run as "ordinary" home or business environment but not for development, especially, serious Ada applications development. I can't seem to decide between Debian and Gentoo.... -- Adrian Hoe http://adrianhoe.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-22 4:12 ` Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-22 9:06 ` Pascal Obry 2006-03-22 9:49 ` Ludovic Brenta 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Pascal Obry @ 2006-03-22 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrian Hoe Adrian Hoe a �crit : > I can't seem to decide between Debian and Gentoo.... Then you want Debian, Ludovic Brenta is doing quite a nice work for Ada on this distrib. Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-22 9:06 ` Pascal Obry @ 2006-03-22 9:49 ` Ludovic Brenta 2006-03-25 16:25 ` Adrian Hoe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2006-03-22 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw) Thanks, Alex and Pascal. With Debian you can choose between Stable, Testing and Unstable. Stable deserves its name. The latest release is Debian 3.1 "Sarge". It contains One... Million... Lines of Ada, properly compiled and packaged and easy to install as binary packages. This is a complete Ada platform, suitable for development and deployment (i.e. you can make your own packages based on it). This platform is based on gnat 3.15p with ASIS, GLADE and Florist, and supports i386, powerpc, and sparc. In addition, the package `gnat-3.4' is available, but unsupported. The next stable release of Debian is scheduled for December 2006. Its code name is Etch. Etch is today in "testing" state; it changes every day as new packages migrate from "unstable" to "testing". The Ada platform is currently the same as in Sarge, but it now supports kfreebsd-i386 (GNU/kFreeBSD) too. gnat-3.4 has been removed, gnat-4.0 has been added but is not supported. There is a plan to migrate the whole platform to GCC 4.1 before Etch is released. I have already started the ground work for this, and will keep you posted on progress if you like. The transition will bring support for Ada 2005, amd64, ppc64, sparc64, hppa, hppa64, and biarch (i386-amd64, powerpc-ppc64, sparc-sparc64, hppa-hppa64). One large piece of work that awaits me is porting ASIS and GLADE to GCC 4.1. This will be a big-bang transition, because the ABI change requires recompiling all packages and changing the sonames of all libraries. But I will make sure that upgrading "Sarge" to "Etch" will be as simple as "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade". If you want to see this transition in progress and participate in it, you need to use "unstable" plus the gcc-4.1 package from "experimental". I'll also need a lot of help from people with 64-bit hardware, and to make biarch work properly. Full details are in the Debian Policy for Ada, of which I just published the second edition: http://www.ada-france.org/debian/debian-ada-policy.html -- Ludovic Brenta. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-22 9:49 ` Ludovic Brenta @ 2006-03-25 16:25 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-25 16:43 ` Adrian Hoe ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-25 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw) That sounds promising. I have run tests on a Debian (Sarge) machine and I intend to overwrite another Debian machine with Gentoo so that I can compare both. I am also interested in amd64. My company is planning to move some development to amd64 some late 2006. To satisfy curiosity, what exactly " It contains One... Million... Lines of Ada, properly compiled and packaged and easy to install as binary packages."? Is it gnat or other software packages? -- Adrian Hoe http://adrianhoe.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-25 16:25 ` Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-25 16:43 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-26 0:09 ` Ludovic Brenta 2006-03-25 22:04 ` Ludovic Brenta 2006-03-26 0:40 ` Ludovic Brenta 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-25 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw) I got the following GNAT bug compiling my applications: gcc -c -I/usr/lib/ada/floristlib -I../charles/src -I/usr/local/include/gtkada dlg_about_pkg-callbacks.adb +===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+ | 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux) (i586-suse-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure nlists.adb:836 | | Error detected at /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.3/adainclude/s-finimp.ads:37:1| | I could not trace the origin of the bug. Downgrading gnat is not possible. I hope 3.4 or 4.x can solve my problem. I get 3.4 and 4.x, the only option is to upgrade to SuSE 10. That's one of the critical reason I want to move away from SuSE. If Debian can allow me to install unstable or testing release of gnat, I will definitely consider Debian to be our main development/test platform. Also, is it possible to install more than 1 release of gcc/gnat and switch among the release? For example, to switch to 3.4: sudo gcc_select 3.4 I can't find gcc_select in Debian. -- Adrian Hoe http://adrianhoe.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-25 16:43 ` Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-26 0:09 ` Ludovic Brenta 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2006-03-26 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw) Adrian Hoe writes: > I got the following GNAT bug compiling my applications: > > gcc -c -I/usr/lib/ada/floristlib -I../charles/src > -I/usr/local/include/gtkada dlg_about_pkg-callbacks.adb > +===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+ > | 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux) (i586-suse-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure nlists.adb:836 | > | Error detected at /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.3/adainclude/s-finimp.ads:37:1| > | > > I could not trace the origin of the bug. Downgrading gnat is not > possible. I hope 3.4 or 4.x can solve my problem. I get 3.4 and 4.x, > the only option is to upgrade to SuSE 10. That's one of the critical > reason I want to move away from SuSE. The Ada front-end in GCC 3.3 is pretty much the same as in 3.2 and 3.1, and is buggy because of the move from the GCC 2.8 backend to the GCC 3.x backend. GCC 3.4 should be okay. GCC 4.0 has the same problem again, due to the new Tree-SSA backend. GCC 4.1 should be okay. > If Debian can allow me to install unstable or testing release of > gnat, I will definitely consider Debian to be our main > development/test platform. Your decision boils down to this: do you want to (a) develop/test your programs on a stable platform, or (b) develop/test GNAT on an unstable platform (unstable because GNAT is part of the platform)? If you answer (a), then Debian 3.1 "Sarge" (stable) is for you. Debian is the only distribution that provides a stable platform for Ada development and deployment. My goal as a Debian maintainer is to address the needs of people who answer (a). If you answer (b), then there are several ways in which you can contribute to GNAT development. The most obvious one is to check out the latest sources of GCC from the Subversion repository at gcc.gnu.org, and compile them for yourself. You can do this on any distribution, so you can keep SuSE. Or, you can install the package gnat-4.1 on top of Debian "Sid" (unstable). Then you will be able to contribute to the very interesting transition to gnat-4.1 as the default Ada compiler for Debian. The ground work I'm currently doing involves patching GCC's configure and build scripts, as well as the Ada front-end. If that sounds interesting to you, then please join in! > Also, is it possible to install more than 1 release of gcc/gnat and > switch among the release? Possible, yes. Easy, no. As a consequence of my goal of providing a stable Ada platform, I have decided to support only one version of GNAT at a time, but to support it well. The packages gnat, gnat-3.3, gnat-3.4, gnat-4.0 and gnat-4.1 conflict with each other. If you want to install several of them in parallel, you need to use either full-blown chroots, or install with "dpkg --root" and use $PATH and "gcc -B". I personally have a chroot where I work on gnat-4.1, while my main installation has gnat installed. Here is a little summary of which versions of gnat are available in which versions of Debian: Sarge (stable): gnat, gnat-3.3, gnat-3.4 Etch (testing): gnat, gnat-4.0 Sid (unstable): gnat, gnat-4.0 experimental: gnat-4.1 "experimental" is not a full version of Debian; it is a small number of packages that you must install on top of Sid. The only supported version is gnat. All the others are for experimentation only. -- Ludovic Brenta. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-25 16:25 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-25 16:43 ` Adrian Hoe @ 2006-03-25 22:04 ` Ludovic Brenta 2006-03-26 0:40 ` Ludovic Brenta 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2006-03-25 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw) "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> writes: > That sounds promising. I have run tests on a Debian (Sarge) machine and > I intend to overwrite another Debian machine with Gentoo so that I can > compare both. > > I am also interested in amd64. My company is planning to move some > development to amd64 some late 2006. > > To satisfy curiosity, what exactly " It contains One... Million... > Lines of Ada, properly compiled and packaged and easy to install as > binary packages."? Is it gnat or other software packages? The packages I maintain total a little over 1 million lines of Ada, as per SLOCCount; i.e. not including blank lines or comments, and not including other languages like C or Makefile. The largest packages are gnat and GPS (300 kSLOC each), GtkAda (90 kSLOC), ASIS (85 kSLOC), GLADE (78 kSLOC), AWS (55 kSLOC), etc. In addition, gnat-3.3 and gnat-3.4 contain some 700 kSLOC which I have not counted in the "one million" figure, because I don't support these versions of GNAT. Full details are here: http://libresoft.dat.escet.urjc.es/debian-counting/sarge/ -- Ludovic Brenta. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? 2006-03-25 16:25 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-25 16:43 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-25 22:04 ` Ludovic Brenta @ 2006-03-26 0:40 ` Ludovic Brenta 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2006-03-26 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw) "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> writes: > I am also interested in amd64. My company is planning to move some > development to amd64 some late 2006. That's not supported at the moment, but will be after the transition to gnat-4.1. -- Ludovic Brenta. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-26 0:40 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-03-21 14:11 GNAT on Debian or Gentoo? Adrian Hoe 2006-03-21 15:19 ` Alex R. Mosteo 2006-03-21 23:42 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-22 3:08 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-23 14:00 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-23 14:46 ` Alex R. Mosteo 2006-03-24 5:22 ` Bobby D. Bryant 2006-03-24 15:02 ` Alex R. Mosteo 2006-03-23 19:46 ` Martin Krischik 2006-03-22 2:40 ` Jeffrey Creem 2006-03-22 4:12 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-22 9:06 ` Pascal Obry 2006-03-22 9:49 ` Ludovic Brenta 2006-03-25 16:25 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-25 16:43 ` Adrian Hoe 2006-03-26 0:09 ` Ludovic Brenta 2006-03-25 22:04 ` Ludovic Brenta 2006-03-26 0:40 ` Ludovic Brenta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox