From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: mingw vs cygwin
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:38:02 +0100
Date: 2006-02-06T15:38:02+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43e75f4a$0$335$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oggeu1pivmed47t68saj6ralkbk1l7nhde@4ax.com>
Craig Carey wrote:
> Comments alleging that GCC is getting lessa and less able to build
> a correct executables, at least since maybe August 2003, is at the
> GMP big numbers package: http://swox.com/gmp/
Actually, the comments indicate that the situation is improving
more and more. Same page says,
"We've had some luck with GCC 3.4.x on some systems,..."
"UPDATE: We've had much more luck with GCC 4.0.1.
It might actually be a usable compiler, but the usual care should be applied."
-- Georg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-06 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-30 14:57 mingw vs cygwin midgleyben
2006-01-31 0:51 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-01-31 2:29 ` Stephen Leake
2006-02-06 12:45 ` Craig Carey
2006-02-06 14:38 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox