From: "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@cogeco.ca>
Subject: Re: [OT] Systems Software Research is Irrelevant
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:30:27 -0400
Date: 2004-10-06T12:30:27-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43V8d.12374$HO1.866275@news20.bellglobal.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cjut44$4hn$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> Chris Humphries <chris@unixfu.net> wrote:
> : Systems Software Research is Irrelevant
> : by Rob Pike of Bell Laboratories
>
> [... ]
> : It is an interesting read :)
>
> And Plan 9 is an interesting experience. I wish those who
> write Windows programs (or bindings) would have had this
> experience :)
> -- Georg
I have Plan 9 on my "to do" list, but one of the things
that puts me off is that likelyhood of no GNAT compiler.
Does anyone know if there has been a plan 9 porting effort
of GNAT? If there was, plan 9's priority on my to do list
would certainly change ;-)
--
Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
http://home.cogeco.ca/~ve3wwg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 19:16 [OT] Systems Software Research is Irrelevant Chris Humphries
2004-10-05 19:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-06 16:30 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG [this message]
2004-10-06 17:33 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-10-06 19:41 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-07 16:23 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2004-10-05 23:13 ` Björn Persson
2004-10-06 11:51 ` Chris Humphries
2004-10-06 13:41 ` Marc A. Criley
2004-10-06 18:06 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox