From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Why was it done this way ?
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:39:46 +0200
Date: 2005-10-27T11:37:38+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43609fe2$0$22537$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <%DV7f.13378$rE2.2085@fe10.lga>
Heimlich Manure wrote:
> Hello respectable group,
>
> This may be a silly question but I'm sure there was reasoning behind
> allowing such :
pragma Restrictions (No_Task_Hierarchy);
> with Ada.Text_IO;
> use Ada.Text_IO;
>
> procedure My_Example is
> task type T1;
> task type T2;
>
> task body T1 is
> begin
> Put_Line("Instantiating T2 from T1");
> declare
> T_2_2 : T2;
> ...
> Question is, why is this legit ?
I think it might be difficult in general to detect mutual
recursion, but IANALL ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-27 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-27 1:00 Why was it done this way ? Heimlich Manure
2005-10-27 2:30 ` jimmaureenrogers
2005-10-27 2:39 ` Heimlich Manure
2005-10-27 6:09 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-10-27 6:46 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2005-10-27 2:46 ` Steve
2005-10-27 9:39 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2005-10-27 15:07 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox