From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL, generics
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:36:27 +0200
Date: 2005-10-03T10:36:27+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4340ED8B.6030208@mailinator.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60bvjt9vl07y$.1nmt309hh2hhr.dlg@40tude.net>
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> It seems that in GNAT GPL generics are even more buggy than they were in
> 3.15p. The most interesting new "feature" is that you can have spec. and
> body compiled and yet get errors in them upon instantiation, just like in
> C++ templates!
This isn't specially new, albeit I don't know if it is more frequent. I
had an experience like this with 3.15p IIRC. Fortunately it was quite
rare, it's the only time I've seen it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-03 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-02 9:15 GNAT GPL, generics Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-10-02 9:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-10-02 10:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-10-03 8:36 ` Alex R. Mosteo [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox