From: Adrien Plisson <aplisson-news@stochastique.net>
Subject: Re: Syntax question: new with a constrained subtype indication
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:22:38 +0200
Date: 2005-04-25T19:22:38+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426d275e$0$1403$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426d20f8$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
Martin Dowie wrote:
> What about 4.8(4):
>
> "An initialized allocator is an allocator with a qualified_expression. An
> uninitialized allocator is one with a subtype_indication. In the
> subtype_indication of an uninitialized allocator, a constraint is
> permitted
> only if the subtype_mark denotes an unconstrained composite subtype;
> if there is no constraint, then the subtype_mark shall denote a definite
> subtype."
but this one does not forbid to write a scalar_constraint when the
subtype_mark is a composite type...
--
rien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-25 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-25 15:44 Syntax question: new with a constrained subtype indication James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 16:07 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2005-04-25 16:34 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 18:52 ` Martin Krischik
2005-04-26 14:17 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 16:18 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-04-25 16:37 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 17:16 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-04-25 16:34 ` Martin Krischik
2005-04-25 19:03 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 17:02 ` Martin Dowie
2005-04-25 17:22 ` Adrien Plisson [this message]
2005-04-25 23:28 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox