From: Adrien Plisson <aplisson-news@stochastique.net>
Subject: Re: Syntax question: new with a constrained subtype indication
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:18:06 +0200
Date: 2005-04-25T18:18:06+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426d183e$0$30465$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426d10d1$1_2@newsfeed.slurp.net>
James Alan Farrell wrote:
> V := new Vector range 1 .. 10;
Vector is a composite type, not a scalar type, so i don't think you
can apply a scalar_constraint to this type. (but you are right, the
grammar does not forbid it explicitly).
have you looked at 3.2.2 and subsequent chapters to see what is said
about constraints ? hint: often things are not forbidden in the
grammar but additional constraints can be found by reading the whole text.
--
rien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-25 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-25 15:44 Syntax question: new with a constrained subtype indication James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 16:07 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2005-04-25 16:34 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 18:52 ` Martin Krischik
2005-04-26 14:17 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 16:18 ` Adrien Plisson [this message]
2005-04-25 16:37 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 17:16 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-04-25 16:34 ` Martin Krischik
2005-04-25 19:03 ` James Alan Farrell
2005-04-25 17:02 ` Martin Dowie
2005-04-25 17:22 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-04-25 23:28 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox