From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-03-20T16:56:29-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42387d28-c983-4e58-9522-815ccd1ad0fb@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p8rhjh$e44$1@dont-email.me>
It sounds interesting. Could you explain a bit more what effect you refer to ? Some code to show it ? Or a link to it.
For the time being, the few things I know is that anonymous types are useful and safe for : coextensions, and controlling access parameters/results and the dispatching they allow.
So if you allude to dispatching, I might understand your point (a bit), otherwise I don't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-20 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 0:37 little precision about anonymous access types Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 1:08 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 1:18 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 14:51 ` AdaMagica
2018-03-19 22:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-03-20 17:49 ` G. B.
2018-03-20 23:56 ` Mehdi Saada [this message]
2018-03-21 22:46 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-15 0:20 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-15 0:28 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-15 21:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-16 8:14 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-16 8:23 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-17 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-17 21:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-17 21:36 ` J-P. Rosen
2018-05-18 7:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-05-15 21:44 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox