From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Ada syntax patents
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:04:50 +0100
Date: 2005-02-22T17:04:43+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421b581b$0$13221$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
Reading
"http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?"
& "Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html"
& "&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040230959%22.PGNR."
& "&OS=DN/20040230959&RS=DN/20040230959", i.e.
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040230959%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20040230959&RS=DN/20040230959
about compiling the BASIC IsNot operator, Patent Application 20040230959.
What's this? What are they trying to protect? Is something
like this on the way for Ada?
Interesting, everyone with an interest in a software exchange
with a US resident/whatever will have to consider whether they
can use comparison operators without being US-charged, patent
(im)pending.
-- Georg
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-22 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-22 16:04 Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2005-02-23 7:59 ` Ada syntax patents Martin Krischik
2005-02-23 8:56 ` rien
2005-02-23 9:42 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-23 10:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-02-23 11:00 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2005-02-23 12:44 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-23 14:02 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2005-02-23 19:14 ` Preben Randhol
2005-02-23 10:24 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2005-02-23 14:54 ` rien
2005-02-24 19:31 ` Charles Lindsey
2005-02-24 16:04 ` george.priv
2005-02-24 19:16 ` Larry Kilgallen
2005-02-24 19:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-02-24 20:50 ` tmoran
2005-02-24 22:19 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox