From: Stapler <spam.magnet@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Novice help with types and de-allocation.
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:33:52 GMT
Date: 2002-11-18T21:33:52+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41dC9.70254$NH2.4504@sccrnsc01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4519e058.0211180729.10b630dc@posting.google.com
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:29:53 -0500, Ted Dennison wrote:
> Probably the best way out would be to make Int_Buffer a *subtype* of
> Buff_Out, instead of a type in its own right. If you don't like that
> solution, then the next best thing would be to make the private
> definition of "Int_Buffer" a "new Buff_Out". That would allow you to use
> a simple type conversion.
I've taken your guys advise, and it works. I'm making it a point to put
a lot more forethought into my type system.
Thanks.
Stapler
"One day at a time and we'll never get there."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-18 6:40 Novice help with types and de-allocation Stapler
2002-11-18 11:05 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2002-11-18 15:29 ` Ted Dennison
2002-11-18 21:33 ` Stapler [this message]
2002-11-18 23:34 ` Stapler
2002-11-18 19:06 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox