From: Adrien Plisson <aplisson-news@stochastique.net>
Subject: Re: Communication between Ada and Java through named pipes
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:43:48 +0100
Date: 2004-12-19T17:43:48+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41c5af48$0$25070$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cq3nnl$mfb$1@online.de>
Michael Paus wrote:
> If you do not have the strict requirement to use named pipes I would
> switch to
> sockets. That is much better documented, more general, more flexible and is
> known to work with Ada and Java on almost any platform you can think of.
> Why would you want to go through the pain getting ancient named pipes to
> work?
simply because of efficiency ? tcp/ip protocols have some overhead we
can't always afford if we need high throughput.
i never used named pipes, but i used shared memory once to communicate
straight between VB and C++. ultra platform specific, but extremely
efficient...
--
rien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-19 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-18 11:28 Communication between Ada and Java through named pipes Mauro Riva
2004-12-18 18:26 ` Freejack
2004-12-19 11:12 ` Michael Paus
2004-12-19 16:43 ` Adrien Plisson [this message]
2004-12-19 18:18 ` u_int32_t
2004-12-19 21:36 ` Adrien Plisson
2004-12-19 21:38 ` Brian May
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox