From: Jeff Houck <jhouck@northrim.net>
Subject: Thick vs. Thin bindings
Date: 26 Nov 2004 16:07:12 +0100
Date: 2004-11-26T16:07:12+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41a746a0@x-privat.org> (raw)
As I continue to evaluate Ada in the role of a game dev language, I've
run across references to "thick" and "thin" bindings and I'm a bit
confused.
My initial design goals are to keep the number of external dependancies
to a minimum with most of the support code written in Ada. I would like
the code interfaces to be as simple as possible to implement for a
designer. I believe this would necessitate a "thick" binding. Is that
correct? Would anyone like to elaborate on the pros and cons of these
two binding methodologies? Further reading material? Tutorials? Thx!
--
X-Privat "FREE Usenet" - http://www.newsserver.it
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-26 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-26 15:07 Jeff Houck [this message]
2004-11-26 16:55 ` Thick vs. Thin bindings Marius Amado Alves
2004-11-27 18:13 ` Jeff Houck
2004-11-27 22:16 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-11-26 19:32 ` David Botton
2004-11-27 7:25 ` Martin Krischik
2004-11-29 7:50 ` tmoran
2004-12-01 17:14 ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox