From: Adrien Plisson <aplisson-news@stochastique.net>
Subject: Re: Unchecked deallocation question
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 00:24:15 +0100
Date: 2004-11-26T00:24:15+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41a66926$0$25070$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4540106.PdnsrBBvo5@linux1.krischik.com>
Martin Krischik wrote:
> You should carefully thing if you really need it. Unlike C/C++ the following
> is actually valid:
>
> declare
> It : Root'Class := Derived'(...);
> begin
> ...
> end;
mmmm, i don't think there is any problem doing this in C++:
class Root;
class Derived : public Root;
Root &It = Derived( ... );
it just uses a reference type which is almost the same as ada access
type but you cannot assign null to it and cannot dereference it.
--
rien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-25 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-24 15:38 Unchecked deallocation question Alex R. Mosteo
2004-11-24 17:24 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-11-24 17:35 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2004-11-24 17:33 ` David Botton
2004-11-25 8:35 ` Martin Krischik
2004-11-25 9:12 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2004-11-25 23:24 ` Adrien Plisson [this message]
2004-11-26 4:05 ` Jim Rogers
2004-11-26 10:53 ` Sergey
2004-11-26 9:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-11-26 18:20 ` Sergey
2004-11-27 8:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox