From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@baesystems.com>
Subject: AI-344, generics/instances...
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:58:35 +0100
Date: 2004-09-16T13:58:35+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41498c90$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> (raw)
Just a thought that popped into my head and I wanted a 'sanity' check on if
first...
With AI-344 generic packages that define a tagged type no longer have to be
instantiated at library level. I was wondering if it would be useful to
define a mechanism (pragma?) that allowed an author to insist that a generic
package be instantiated at library level.
This came to me when I was looking at my Singleton pattern, which is just
fine for Ada95 but will be much more open to abuse come Ada0Y. My code looks
roughly like this:
generic
package Patterns.Generic_Singletons is
type Singleton is tagged private;
private
-- Implementation that uses assumes library level instance
end Patterns.Generic_Singletons;
Perhaps something as simple as:
generic
package Patterns.Generic_Singletons is
pragma Library_Level_Unit; -- new pragma
type Singleton is tagged private;
private
-- Implementation that uses assumes library level instance
end Patterns.Generic_Singletons;
Our am I missing something?
Cheers
-- Martin
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-16 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-16 12:58 Martin Dowie [this message]
2004-09-16 17:51 ` AI-344, generics/instances Randy Brukardt
2004-09-16 20:03 ` Martin Dowie
2004-09-17 8:51 ` Peter Hermann
2004-09-17 11:19 ` Number_Base 36 revisited (was: AI-344, generics/instances...) Marius Amado Alves
2004-09-17 13:26 ` AI-344, generics/instances Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox