Re: Q: Line_IO

[Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>]

On Aug 31, 3:05 am, Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauh...@futureapps.de>
wrote:
> Martin schrieb:
>
> > Nice one...I'll try these out on Win23 and see what happens :-)
>
> Thanks.  As is, the program will raise NAME_ERROR on Win32: It
> still seems impossible to name the standard streams for
> Stream_IO.Open on Win32?  The package has worked with (other) named
> files, though.
>
> > But surely "Put_Line" and "Get_Line" are preferable subprogram
> > names?...
>
> The names Put_Line (for Print) and Get_Line (for Getline)
> could suggest that these are perfect replacements.
> For Print, that is basically the case for standard output,
> I think.
> Getline, however, needs a little more care than Get_Line
> when using it.  At the moment, at least.

I am curious how close when compared to GNAT.IO.Put_Line and
GNAT.IO.Get_Line. If it is close enough, I would say it is the best of
both worlds, speed and portability.

Anh Vo